Across Florida
What's happening on other political blogs?

Sachs: ‘I am a legal resident of the District I represent in the Florida Senate. Period’

by George Bennett | August 20th, 2013


Democratic state Sen. Maria Sachs has won two procedural victories over a complainant who accused her of not living at the Fort Lauderdale address she lists as her residence.

The rulings do not address the merits of the claim that Sachs lives outside Senate District 34, but Sachs said they bolster her declaration of residency.

“I am a legal resident of the District I represent in the Florida Senate. Period. The Florida Senate Rules Committee as well as the Commission on Ethics of the State of Florida have both issued reports that support that fact,” Sachs said in a recent e-mail to The Palm Beach Post.

Sachs and her husband own a house west of Boca Raton that is outside Senate District 34. But Sachs last year changed the address on her voter registration and driver license to a 740-square-foot Fort Lauderdale condo unit that she rents from lobbyist and friend Judy Stern in District 34. Sachs also removed her name, but not her husband’s, from the homestead exemption on their Boca Raton property.

After a conservative website and media outlets questioned Sachs’ residency claim earlier this year, Tamarac resident Matthew Feiler filed complaints with the Senate Rules Committee and the Florida Commission on Ethics.

The Rules Committee tossed Feiler’s complaint on July 23, noting that Feiler relied on media accounts rather than first-hand knowledge of the allegations.

“This dismissal should not be taken as passing on the merits of the complaint,” Senate Rules Chairman John Thrasher, R-Jacksonville, wrote in the dismissal letter.

The Ethics Commission also dismissed a Feiler complaint, ruling that his allegations that Sachs committed perjury and filed a false document were criminal in nature and fell outside the commission’s jurisdiction.

“No factual investigation preceded the review, and therefore the Commission’s conclusions do not reflect on the accuracy of the complaint,” a commission order dated July 31 says.

Sachs also provided the Palm Beach Post with a letter from her attorney, constitutional law expert Bruce Rogow, to support her residency claim.

The Florida Constitution says a legislator must be “an elector and resident of the district from which elected.” But there is no specific definition of residency in Florida elections laws.

“Residence is established by objective facts and intent to reside,” Rogow wrote in a July 25 letter to Sachs. “Based upon the information provided to me (your lease, rent checks, driver’s license, voter’s registration, relinquishment of homestead) and your specific intention to reside, you have met the Constitutional requirements.”

Controversy over the residency of Sachs and other lawmakers has led Senate President Don Gaetz, R-Niceville, and House Speaker Will Weatherford, R-Wesley Chapel, to launch an effort to more precisely define residency rules for lawmakers.


12 Responses to “Sachs: ‘I am a legal resident of the District I represent in the Florida Senate. Period’”

  1. fran Says:

    Show us the rent checks.

  2. Ted the Nimble Says:

    She’s a Democrat. They never lie!

  3. Jackie Says:

    Politicos are master manipulators. It is so boring to read these kind of stories. She doesn’t appear to be a person that would rent a small 750 square foot apt., however, it is the way she plays the game. Boy, you couldn’t get away with that game if you wanted your children to go to another school in another district, now would ya.

  4. Mike Says:

    Maria Sachs would never rent a 750 square foot home and actually live in it. She’s a multimillionaire. Its ridiculous. They should sell their house outside the district and move into the house in the district. This shouldnt be partisan. There are plenty of qualified Democrats who live in the district who can represent this area. I do not like this at all.

  5. Mike Says:

    I would respect these politicians if they simply admitted they don’t “live” in the houses and point out that the law does not require them to do so. Once the legislature gets around to implementing its own requirements or, better yet, passing laws requiring they actually liver there, then it will be an issue.

  6. Fred Says:

    The letter from Rogow mentions “relinquishment of homestead.” Someone needs to let the property appraiser know about this since it appears they still get it as the market value is over $1 million, but the assessed value is under $500,000.

  7. Repubtallygirl Says:

    Officer Barbrady, nothing to see here, move along.

  8. body supplements india price Says:

    What’s up, always i used to check webpage posts here early in the daylight, because i love to learn more and more.

  9. moncler london Says:

    ミネトンカ 汚れ 落とし方
    moncler london

  10. cheap nike jerseys Says:

    i cant wait to be in yr6 and talking about yr6 i thought that their play was amazing it was really good the dances and singing were my favourite i liked the mumbai and hawaiin dance the most

  11. hgh supplements Says:

    It is appropriate time to mak somne plans for the future and it’s
    time to be happy. I have read this post and if I could I desire to
    suggest you some interesting things or tips. Maybe you can write next articles referring to this article.
    I desire to read even more things about it!

  12. 財布 スカイブルー Says:

    robita ポシェット
    財布 スカイブルー

Florida political tweeters
Video: Politics stories