Across Florida
What's happening on other political blogs?

Weatherford’s “safety net” tale undergoes another change

by John Kennedy | March 6th, 2013

House Speaker Will Weatherford’s poignant tale of his family being helped by a state “safety net” after his 2-year-old brother died of cancer underwent another change Wednesday.

Weatherford, R-Wesley Chapel, said he has now learned that his family’s bills were covered by the Medically Needy program, an optional service which helps transplant patients and families dealing with catastrophic illnesses.

Usually, those in the program have income levels which otherwise disqualify them for conventional Medicaid.

Weatherford now opposes expanding Medicaid to 138 percent of the poverty level, a position at odds with fellow Republican Gov. Rick Scott, who supports expansion under the federal Affordable Care Act.

Analysts say expanding Medicaid could bring another 1 million lower-income Floridians into the program. Most, like the Weatherford family at the time, have no insurance.

Weatherford had declined Tuesday to explain how his family was helped after telling a joint session of the Legislature that the family faced a “mountain of medical bills” but somehow found assistance.

Weatherford cited his family’s experience in declaring his support for a “strong safety net for Florida” even as he reaffirmed opposition to the Medicaid expansion.

But a Weatherford staffer later told the Palm Beach Post that Weatherford, after checking with his father, believed the family benefited from charity care. Medical professionals, basically, had written-off the family’s costs, he believed.

Further review by his family showed Wednesday that it was Medically Needy that helped, Weatherford said.

The Florida Hospital Association is supporting Medicaid expansion to reduce the $2.8 billion in uncompensated, charity care hospitals were forced to swallow last year. The Medically Needy program has been frequently targeted for elimination by lawmakers — but has endured.

“It is not surprising that recollections would be cloudy surrounding a time of great sorrow and difficulty,”Weatherford said in releasing a statement Wednesday which attemped to clarify the family’s situation. “Now that the safety net that benefitted my family has been clearly identified, I trust that the debate can return to the important question of Medicaid expansion and its impact on the economic and personal freedom of Floridians.”

House Democratic Leader Perry Thurston of Fort Lauderale, though, said later that Weatherford’s family story makes a case for Medicaid expansion.

“Personal stories like the one involving Speaker Weatherford’s family are a factor in why Florida House Democratic Caucus members believe that more Floridians deserve a safety net under an expansion of Medicaid,” Thurston said.

He added, “I trust that my colleagues in the Legislature understand that rather than politicizing the Speaker’s tragic loss, we should focus now on the future of Florida’s health policy. ”


4 Responses to “Weatherford’s “safety net” tale undergoes another change”

  1. Kevin Says:

    Can you say hypocrite? I know several tea party types who say the government has no business being involved in peoples healthcare nor should they be providing unemployment assistance but when they the ones in need justify the fact that they take the check by saying “well, I may as well since everybody else is doing it” I deserve my share too. That’s a hypocritical do as I say not as I do scenario. I would have a lot more money in my pocket each month to enjoy life with if I didn’t do the responsible thing and purchase my own health insurance. His family is deadbeat by his own definition. This dude should be hammered on his hypocrisy this every time he takes the podium. Hospitals and medical professionals don’t “write off” as he puts it, people’s medical bills. I pay for it in increased policy costs because people like Weatherford’s family are irresponsible. Subsidize those who can’t afford it and mandate those who can to purchase a policy. That’s what “Obamacare” does.

  2. Searcher1 Says:

    This man is letting IDEOLOGY get in the way of his family story, which CORRECTLY showed government needs to help in some healthcare situations. Everyone else, like myself, will continue to pay for insurance. Maybe it would be a little cheaper if I could get into a GROUP PLAN……

  3. Oops Says:

    If what was said wasn’t intended it begs the question of his involvement in such decision making. The state of the economy will probably satisfy the concern of millions of lower income residents without influx from the outside. Any program that helps those in need is the act of a Good Samaritan. The real concern is the management of the program to eliminate abuses thereby controlling cost which has suffered oner the years.

  4. Quibids Says:

    Whats up, This can be a good summation, I located your blog checking google for any similar subject and observed this. I couldnt find as well significantly other tips and details on this posting, so it was great to discover this one. I’ll probably be returning to think about several other posts which you have written another time.

Florida political tweeters
Video: Politics stories