Across Florida
What's happening on other political blogs?

House passes random drug tests for state workers

by Dara Kam | March 2nd, 2012

State workers would have to agree to and submit to random, suspicionless drug tests under a measure approved along party lines by the GOP-dominated Florida House.

The bill, a priority of Gov. Rick Scott’s, would allow state agencies to order the tests of up to 10 percent of workers four times a year. Agency heads would have to use the money already in their budgets to cover the costs of the tests for the state’s 114,000 workforce.

Rep. Mark Pafford, D-West Palm Beach, tried to amend the bill to require that the governor, members of the Florida Cabinet and the 160 members of the state House and Senate also be required to submit to the urine tests. The bill’s sponsor Jimmie Smith, R-Inverness, dismissed the amendment, set aside over Pafford’s objection, as “political theater.”

But, calling the House an “elitist body,” Pafford chided his colleagues, saying “Shame on you,” for being unwilling to go on the board with a vote on his amendment.

Drug testing government workers is a violation of the constitution’s guarantee of unreasonable search and seizure by the government, Democratic lawmakers argued.

Last week, a federal judge heard oral arguments in a lawsuit over a challenge to a drug-testing policy imposed on state workers by Scott last year. After the ACLU and the state workers union sued the state, Scott in June quietly reversed his order for all but corrections officers pending the outcome of the case.

Scott last year also pushed the legislature to pass a law requiring that food stamp and emergency cash assistance applicants pass drug tests before receiving benefits. In October, a federal judge temporarily put that requirement on hold, ruling the drug screens were unconstitutional.

Rep. Perry Thurston, a lawyer, argued that Smith’s measure goes after the wrong population.

“You pick on people who you can bully around. Tell the lawyers of the Florida Bar as a condition of practicing law you’ve got to submit to suspicionless drug testing. That’s where you change society,” Thurston, D-Plantation, said.

Other Democrats called the proposal (HB 1205) a solution in search of a problem. Only two of 500 Department of Transportion – .004 percent – tested positive for drugs in recent screenings, Rep. Rick Kriseman, D-St. Petersburg, said.

But a fired-up Smith insisted his proposal (HB 1205) is necessary to combat drug abuse and said it would make Florida a model for the nation.

“People are dying. And then you make an assumption because these are state workers this doesn’t affect their lives,” Smith said. “The state of Florida by taking this vote becomes a laboratory that…eventually leads the way of the entire nation. You will be having the courage, making the difference, for this entire country.”

Smith made his final pitch before the 79-37 vote: “The word is on the street. People are starting to realize it. Drugs are bad.”

A Senate companion bill is scheduled for a vote in the budget committee this afternoon.

Tags: , , , , ,

6 Responses to “House passes random drug tests for state workers”

  1. TP Says:

    Ok, let me get this straight. Drug testing for welfare recipients has been declared unconstitutional, Dick Scott’s executive order for drug testing state worker’s is in litigation….so tell me why this idiot Jimmy Smith (who I hear only has a GED and not even a diploma) pushing for this bill that will also be found unconstitutional. Why are these “leaders” so gung ho on drug testing EVERYONE but themselves? They are probably the most pickled bunch in Florida.

  2. Downtown Danny Says:

    Just another group of Republicans PUTTING MORE GOVERNMENT IN YOUR LIFE.
    They won’t even practice what they preach. It’s ok to test others but not themselves.
    If someone want to smoke weed or snort coke on their off time thats their business, not the governments. As long as it does not affect their work its not the gov’s business.

  3. Termack Says:

    Marc Pafford should be Governor.

  4. legal eagle Says:

    Its unconstitutional-period. And why is it that no one such as the Governor is required to also take this test? Last time I checked he was a state worker- overpaid state worker- but a state worker nevertheless.

  5. Bill Neubauer Says:

    1. Let’s get past this privacy complaint and recognize that THERE IS NO PAIN INVOLVED. What are the objectors afraid or shamed of? Nobody gets hurt.
    2. When the federal judge put the case of the food stamps “on hold,” I am, as I am so often, disappointed in the judge. Arent’ they appointed (or elected) to MAKE DECISIONS. Shakespeare had it right with his reference to “the laws’s delays.” Things haven’t changed.
    (in that regard I am deeply disappointed that the Supreme Court has not decided on the health insurance mandate. People should have known for months how they had to prepare for that. The justices should not have blithely gone on vacation when Americans wanted/needed a ruling on something that affected all of us.

  6. James Says:

    Whay a bunch of hypocrites. Test everyone else but not us. I guess that would interfere with their cocaine addled parties the lobbiest throw them. Do we really need to spend money to find out the guy who cleans the floor likes to smoke pot on the weekends. What a waste. Statistacly drug testing int he work place has proven no significant gain since it started in earnist in 1996.

Florida political tweeters
Video: Politics stories